Overblog
Editer l'article Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
23 avril 2009 4 23 /04 /avril /2009 17:23
(page originale sur Bivouac ID)

Un voile islamiste à la Maison Blanche.

Dalia Mogahed, une entorchonnée égypto-américaine, a été nommée pour conseiller le président Barack Hussein Obama sur les préjugés et les problèmes rencontrés par les musulmans.
Le 
 étant l’emblème du système islamiste, cette femme en hidjab qui entre à la Maison Blanche est un symbole très fort pour les islamites. Un signal qui ne manquera pas d’encourager leurs velléités.

Le 5 février dernier, par un décret exécutif , Obama a institué le «Bureau des partenariats religieux»  à la Maison-Blanche où siègera une femme en hidjab. Dalia Mogahed, analyste et directrice générale du Centre Gallup des Études Musulmanes, a été nommé ce mois-ci à ce poste de conseillère d’Obama. 

Le journal algérien El-Watan ne cache pas sa joie:  «De fait, elle est la première musulmane américaine d’origine arabe à entrer tous les matins à la Maison-Blanche avec son …» écrivent-il en ajoutant «C’est aussi une belle leçon de tolérance et de la reconnaissance du mérite que vient de donner Obama à la France, notamment où le port du voile a été interdit, y compris dans les écoles.»

Dalia Mogahed a déclaré : «Ma tâche consiste à aider le président des  à mieux connaître les musulmans loin du prisme déformant de la violence».

Autrement dit, en clair, son rôle sera de chanter la taqqya en anglais pour rendormir la vigilance qu’entretient l’Amérique envers l’,  depuis qu’elle a été frappée par les attentats du 11 septembre.

Sources : 
L.A.TimesEl Watan

Quand tout le monde voit ceci

 

Les islamistes eux, voient cela :

 
Partager cet article
Repost0

commentaires

A
<br /> Wow, superbe article, merci de partager ces conseils, et notez tout d'abord que je suis complètement d'accord... J'insiste, votre blog est réellement bon, je bookmarke votre site de ce pas... PS :<br /> C'est mon 1er commentaire ici et je reviendrai avec plaisir sur votre blog !<br /> <br /> <br />
Répondre
I
<br /> More & more people know that blog are good for every one where we get lots of information any topics !!!<br /> ________________________<br /> <br /> Increase Penis Size<br /> <br /> <br />
Répondre
S
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=93657 WHISTLEBLOWER  MAGAZINE The ultimate special report on eligibility <br /> <br /> 2 April  2009 Why millions still demand proof Obama is constitutionally fit for office <br />  <br /> <br />  <br /> With Barack Obama in the White House, millions of Americans are watching the news night after night in sheer shock, wondering out loud what the next unprecedented expansion of government power will be. Nationalizing entire industries with gigantic taxpayer bailouts; forcing taxpayers to fund abortion; releasing Gitmo prisoners onto U.S. streets; rapidly converting free-market, capitalist America into a government-run socialist state – every day seems to bring a new unconstitutional power-grab, critics say.<br /> But arguably Obama’s most egregious, unconstitutional “power-grab” as president may have been his very first – being elected to the highest office in the land while steadfastly refusing to offer proof he is a “natural born citizen,” as required of all presidents by the U.S. Constitution.<br /> That explosive story is the focus of the April 2009 edition of WND’s acclaimed Whistleblower magazine. It’s called “YOUR PAPERS, PLEASE? Why dozens of lawsuits and millions of Americans want Barack Obama to prove he's constitutionally qualified to be president.”<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> This issue of Whistleblower <br /> “is not only the most complete and thorough exposé of the eligibility questions surrounding Barack Obama's presidency,”<br /> says WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah, “it is an indictment of the process that put him in the White House Jan. 20 of this year.”<br /> Although Article II section 1 of the Constitution clearly requires that all presidents be “natural born citizens,” the 2008 election proved, Farah points out, “that no controlling legal authority bothered to establish” that Obama was qualified for the Oval Office. “Everybody dropped the ball,” said Farah.<br /> The biggest reason interest in the Obama eligibility issue continues to mount, with ever more legal actions being filed and more Americans demanding answers, says WND Managing Editor David Kupelian, is simple:<br /> "Barack Obama is hiding something.  About that statement, there is no dispute. Despite dozens of lawsuits, with plaintiffs including a former presidential candidate,  a former deputy attorney general,  many legislators,  active-duty U.S. military  and other serious people, Obama simply refuses to release his original,  long-form birth certificate.  That's the one that could actually prove  he was born in Hawaii.  What is posted on Obama's 'Fight the Smears' website  as well as the FactCheck.org website  is the abbreviated short-form 'certification of live birth'  that could have been issued for a child born overseas,  and thus does not prove he was born in Hawaii. What is so difficult about this to understand?"<br /> And while some of the many lawsuits challenging Obama on this issue have reached the eyes of U.S. Supreme Court justices, at least one former state Supreme Court chief justice – Alabama’s Roy Moore – now says the Obama eligibility issue should be adjudicated: “Why doesn't the president have to show that he's a natural born citizen? … We've had all kinds of suits filed, and the press doesn't mention them and the courts continually reject them. … It's troubling to me because we'll suffer the consequences if we ignore our Constitution."<br /> Highlights of “YOUR PAPERS, PLEASE?” include:<br /> <br /> "The question of eligibility" by Joseph Farah <br /> "Why I care about the Obama eligibility issue" by David Kupelian <br /> "Why questions persist regarding Obama's qualifications" by Bob Unruh, on why the president's defenders never actually address the merits of eligibility challenges <br /> "The 20th Amendment: What if the president-elect fails to qualify?" <br /> "U.S. military officers demanding eligibility proof" by Bob Unruh, regarding which one plaintiff said, "In the worst case … it's going to be revolution in the streets" <br /> "What is 'quo warranto'" <br /> "Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case" <br /> "Ex-chief justice: 'If he's not a natural born citizen, he's not qualified'" in which former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore weighs in on the issue <br /> "Was Obama born in Hawaii – or Kenya?" by Jerome R. Corsi, who interviews the private detective who investigated Honolulu hospitals claimed as Obama birthplace; also a report on eyewitnesses to Obama's grandmother saying she witnessed his birth in Mombasa, Kenya <br /> "Kenyan ambassador: 'I don't know' if Obama was born in U.S." by Chelsea Schilling – a revealing follow-up to the on-air "gaffe" by African official about president's birth <br /> "What congressmen say about Obama's eligibility," an extensive sampling of what lawmakers are telling constituents about where the president was born <br /> "Eligibility bill hits Congress" by Drew Zahn, detailing U.S. Rep. Bill Posey's proposed law requiring candidates to show birth certificate – which would apply to Obama's re-election <br /> "Congressman scorned for suggesting eligibility proof," documenting media reaction to Rep. Bill Posey's eligibility bill, including MSNBC's Keith Olbermann who advises the congressman to "take the Reynolds Wrap off your head" <br /> "States reviewing 'eligibility' challenges," detailing how Montana has tabled its plan while Oklahoma's gets committee approval <br /> "California used to check presidential candidates' qualifications" <br /> "Wikipedia scrubs Obama eligibility" by Aaron Klein, who documents how the very mention of citizenship issues  is deleted in minutes  and "offending" users banned <br /> "Judge ripped  for using blog hearsay"  by Bob Unruh, on the eligibility case lawyer  who says he's entitled to see Obama's birth certificate  during "discovery" process <br /> "Resolving Obama birth issue 'once and for all'" by Leo C. Donofrio, in which the attorney proposes a solution to what he calls the "bottomless pit of pending litigation" <br /> "Does dual citizenship disqualify a candidate from being president?" <br /> "Chief justice accepts lawsuit docs, WND petition" by Drew Zahn, in which John Roberts agrees to read Obama filings and consider WorldNetDaily's 330,000 online petition signers <br /> "Obama team threatens plaintiffs"  by Alan Keyes,  the former Reagan diplomat  and presidential candidate  who rallies all involved in the eligibility battle  to stand firm<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> “To me, this is a historic issue of Whistleblower magazine,” says Farah.<br /> “I do not pretend to know where the information you are about to read will lead. But I do know that it is explosive, profoundly important and represents much more than the future of the Barack Obama administration. No less than our Constitution – the foundation of our national libert
Répondre
S
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=93657 WHISTLEBLOWER  MAGAZINE The ultimate special report on eligibility <br /> <br /> 2 April  2009 Why millions still demand proof Obama is constitutionally fit for office <br />  <br /> <br />  <br /> With Barack Obama in the White House, millions of Americans are watching the news night after night in sheer shock, wondering out loud what the next unprecedented expansion of government power will be. Nationalizing entire industries with gigantic taxpayer bailouts; forcing taxpayers to fund abortion; releasing Gitmo prisoners onto U.S. streets; rapidly converting free-market, capitalist America into a government-run socialist state – every day seems to bring a new unconstitutional power-grab, critics say.<br /> But arguably Obama’s most egregious, unconstitutional “power-grab” as president may have been his very first – being elected to the highest office in the land while steadfastly refusing to offer proof he is a “natural born citizen,” as required of all presidents by the U.S. Constitution.<br /> That explosive story is the focus of the April 2009 edition of WND’s acclaimed Whistleblower magazine. It’s called “YOUR PAPERS, PLEASE? Why dozens of lawsuits and millions of Americans want Barack Obama to prove he's constitutionally qualified to be president.”<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> This issue of Whistleblower <br /> “is not only the most complete and thorough exposé of the eligibility questions surrounding Barack Obama's presidency,”<br /> says WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah, “it is an indictment of the process that put him in the White House Jan. 20 of this year.”<br /> Although Article II section 1 of the Constitution clearly requires that all presidents be “natural born citizens,” the 2008 election proved, Farah points out, “that no controlling legal authority bothered to establish” that Obama was qualified for the Oval Office. “Everybody dropped the ball,” said Farah.<br /> The biggest reason interest in the Obama eligibility issue continues to mount, with ever more legal actions being filed and more Americans demanding answers, says WND Managing Editor David Kupelian, is simple:<br /> "Barack Obama is hiding something.  About that statement, there is no dispute. Despite dozens of lawsuits, with plaintiffs including a former presidential candidate,  a former deputy attorney general,  many legislators,  active-duty U.S. military  and other serious people, Obama simply refuses to release his original,  long-form birth certificate.  That's the one that could actually prove  he was born in Hawaii.  What is posted on Obama's 'Fight the Smears' website  as well as the FactCheck.org website  is the abbreviated short-form 'certification of live birth'  that could have been issued for a child born overseas,  and thus does not prove he was born in Hawaii. What is so difficult about this to understand?"<br /> And while some of the many lawsuits challenging Obama on this issue have reached the eyes of U.S. Supreme Court justices, at least one former state Supreme Court chief justice – Alabama’s Roy Moore – now says the Obama eligibility issue should be adjudicated: “Why doesn't the president have to show that he's a natural born citizen? … We've had all kinds of suits filed, and the press doesn't mention them and the courts continually reject them. … It's troubling to me because we'll suffer the consequences if we ignore our Constitution."<br /> Highlights of “YOUR PAPERS, PLEASE?” include:<br /> <br /> "The question of eligibility" by Joseph Farah <br /> "Why I care about the Obama eligibility issue" by David Kupelian <br /> "Why questions persist regarding Obama's qualifications" by Bob Unruh, on why the president's defenders never actually address the merits of eligibility challenges <br /> "The 20th Amendment: What if the president-elect fails to qualify?" <br /> "U.S. military officers demanding eligibility proof" by Bob Unruh, regarding which one plaintiff said, "In the worst case … it's going to be revolution in the streets" <br /> "What is 'quo warranto'" <br /> "Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case" <br /> "Ex-chief justice: 'If he's not a natural born citizen, he's not qualified'" in which former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore weighs in on the issue <br /> "Was Obama born in Hawaii – or Kenya?" by Jerome R. Corsi, who interviews the private detective who investigated Honolulu hospitals claimed as Obama birthplace; also a report on eyewitnesses to Obama's grandmother saying she witnessed his birth in Mombasa, Kenya <br /> "Kenyan ambassador: 'I don't know' if Obama was born in U.S." by Chelsea Schilling – a revealing follow-up to the on-air "gaffe" by African official about president's birth <br /> "What congressmen say about Obama's eligibility," an extensive sampling of what lawmakers are telling constituents about where the president was born <br /> "Eligibility bill hits Congress" by Drew Zahn, detailing U.S. Rep. Bill Posey's proposed law requiring candidates to show birth certificate – which would apply to Obama's re-election <br /> "Congressman scorned for suggesting eligibility proof," documenting media reaction to Rep. Bill Posey's eligibility bill, including MSNBC's Keith Olbermann who advises the congressman to "take the Reynolds Wrap off your head" <br /> "States reviewing 'eligibility' challenges," detailing how Montana has tabled its plan while Oklahoma's gets committee approval <br /> "California used to check presidential candidates' qualifications" <br /> "Wikipedia scrubs Obama eligibility" by Aaron Klein, who documents how the very mention of citizenship issues  is deleted in minutes  and "offending" users banned <br /> "Judge ripped  for using blog hearsay"  by Bob Unruh, on the eligibility case lawyer  who says he's entitled to see Obama's birth certificate  during "discovery" process <br /> "Resolving Obama birth issue 'once and for all'" by Leo C. Donofrio, in which the attorney proposes a solution to what he calls the "bottomless pit of pending litigation" <br /> "Does dual citizenship disqualify a candidate from being president?" <br /> "Chief justice accepts lawsuit docs, WND petition" by Drew Zahn, in which John Roberts agrees to read Obama filings and consider WorldNetDaily's 330,000 online petition signers <br /> "Obama team threatens plaintiffs"  by Alan Keyes,  the former Reagan diplomat  and presidential candidate  who rallies all involved in the eligibility battle  to stand firm<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> “To me, this is a historic issue of Whistleblower magazine,” says Farah.<br /> “I do not pretend to know where the information you are about to read will lead. But I do know that it is explosive, profoundly important and represents much more than the future of the Barack Obama administration. No less than our Constitution – the foundation of our national libert
Répondre
W
Le jour où on se rendra compte que nous ne pouvons pas integrer des personnes qui ne veulent pas l'être, à moins de renier nos valeurs, on aura peut-être avancé.Quand on me parle de la bonté de l'islam, je regarde là où cette religion est majoritaire, et le constat n'est qu'un constat d'horreur. Nos deux civilisations sont pour l'instant incompatible et je ne vois pas en quoi la nomination d'une apotre du double langage changera quoi que ce soit à cette réalité.Nous sommes en 2009 et ils en sont restés à une mentalité digne du VIII eme siecle, ils serait grand temps que les europeens le comprennent.Le choc des civilisations, on y est de plein pied.
Répondre